Upsthithi Patrak Prapatr 9
अध्यापक उपस्थिति पत्रक
अध्यापक उपस्थिति पत्रक
air open
Showing posts with label Special Reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Special Reports. Show all posts
Thursday, 6 July 2017
Wednesday, 14 January 2015
Pd proxy premium account Jan 2015
What Is VPN:
VPN is a service that help you hide your ip address.Every device who is
connected to internet has a different ip address and with help of them
any site or third party user can see your location and control your
freedom on internet like ISP are blocking sites and pages in this days.
So the VPN convert your ip address so if you are from india than your ip
can be changed to USA etc.Than if you visit a site from india your ip
address tell the site that you are in USA.Thats how vpn works.
Why PD Proxy:
Pd Proxy is a vpn service and the best part of it is that you can scan
open ports form this for detail i will post a artical soon because of my
exams i am not that active on this site.Pd proxy comes with a software
that is special designed for it,so there is no need to have any
additional tech knowledge to use pd proxy.But the main problem is that
there is a bandwidth limit on their trial accounts so if you wanted
unlimited usage so you have to buy a premium account but now i am
sharing the trick to use trial account unlimited.
Feature Of This Trick:
1. Use pd proxy unlimited at no cost.
2. No need to download any thing.
3. Easy to use.
4. Use it and enjoy free High Speed internet.
5. Increase your slow net speed.
Screen shot
Download Pd proxy premium account
No survey
Datafilehost
Saturday, 15 June 2013
I am applying for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 . Is BCA student passed 10th and 12th in science can apply?
Question : I am applying for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training . Can a BCA student passed 10th and 12th in science apply ?
Answer : No, BCA students can not apply for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training .
The Educational Qualification has changed for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training : -
Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training :
B.A. / B.Sc. OR B.Com. with minimum 50 percent marks in graduation
(For SC, ST, OBC, Vikalang, Swtantrata Senani Aasrit, Bhutpurva sainik Minimum Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training is B.A./ B.Sc. OR B.Com. with minimum 45 percent marks in graduation )
What was Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC Training in Past i.e. BTC Training 2010 ?
Graduation with minimum 50 percent marks
(For SC, ST, OBC, Vikalang, Swtantrata Senani Aasrit, Bhutpurva sainik Minimum Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2010 Training was Graduation with with minimum 45 percent marks)
Monday, 25 March 2013
Problem Solving Assessment PSA
It is a widely
acknowledged fact that research and analytical skills, ability to apply
basic concepts of different subjects, solve application based problems
in Mathematics and Science, comprehend and analyse written text and
effective communication are the skills which ensure success in Higher
Studies and Professional areas. These dimensions of 21st Century life
skills will greatly assist learners in acquiring higher order thinking
skills such as Problem Solving and Decision Making.
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is planning to initiate
“Problem Solving Assessment” (CBSE- PSA) for students of Classes IX and
XI from the second term of session 2012-13.
The board has decided to replace one of the four formative assessments
(FA) with a problem solving assessment (PSA) for Classes IX and XI. The
first test will be conducted on January-February 2013 for Class IX. The
test will involve questions to test a student’s problem-solving
ability.
The PSA is not a new test but it will replace the already existing
pen-paper test in the FA. The only difference will be that PSA will be
conducted by the Board in the respective schools and the evaluation will
be done by the Board. The exam will be conducted on the same day and
the question paper will be provided by the Board. This 90-minute test
will have nothing from the textbooks. It will comprise of questions from
mathematics and an English passage from old essays or contemporary
fiction.
The new criterion will fit into the third and fourth formative
assessments. The fourth assessment includes multiple choice questions,
projects and unit tests. All these will be replaced by a PSA that tests a
student’s knowledge on co-scholastic situations.
Registration for this Assessment will be done separately by the Board
and detailed circular will be issued before the start of the second term
i.e. September 2012.
+PSA ORIGINAL PAPER 2013 FOR CLASS 9TH
+PSA ORIGINAL PAPER 2013 FOR CLASS 9TH
Thursday, 8 September 2011
I am applying for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 . Is BCA student passed 10th and 12th in science can apply?
Question : I am applying for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training . Can a BCA student passed 10th and 12th in science apply ?
Answer : No, BCA students can not apply for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training .
The Educational Qualification has changed for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training : -
Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training :
B.A. / B.Sc. OR B.Com. with minimum 50 percent marks in graduation
(For SC, ST, OBC, Vikalang, Swtantrata Senani Aasrit, Bhutpurva sainik Minimum Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2011 Training is B.A./ B.Sc. OR B.Com. with minimum 45 percent marks in graduation )
What was Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC Training in Past i.e. BTC Training 2010 ?
Graduation with minimum 50 percent marks
(For SC, ST, OBC, Vikalang, Swtantrata Senani Aasrit, Bhutpurva sainik Minimum Educational Qualification for Uttar Pradesh BTC 2010 Training was Graduation with with minimum 45 percent marks)
Monday, 5 September 2011
What is UDRS (Umpire Decision Referal System) or DRS
What is UDRS or DRS
The Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS or DRS) is a new technology based system currently being used on an experimental basis in the sport of cricket.
The system is being used only in Test Cricket for the sole purpose of reviewing the controversial decisions made by the on-field umpires in the case of a batsman being dismissed or not.
UDRS system was first used on 24 November 2009 in Test Matches
The UDRS system was officially launched by International Cricket Council on 24 November 2009 during the first Test between New Zealand and Pakistan at the University Oval in Dunedin.
UDRS system in ODIs
It was first used in ODIs in January 2011, in England’s series against Australia.
Recently, the ICC has made the UDRS mandatory in all international matches.
Cost of UDRS System
The UDRS costs approximately USD 56,000 per match day, that is, almost Rs 25 lakh. And thus, for a five day Test match, the cost may go upto Rs 1.25 crore.
How does UDRS work :
Each team is allowed to make two unsuccessful review requests per innings during a match. A fielding team may use the system to dispute a "not out" call and a batting team may do so to dispute an "out" call.
The fielding team captain or the batsman being dismissed invokes the challenge by signalling a "T" with the arms. Once the challenge is invoked, acknowledged, and agreed, the Third Umpire reviews the play. While umpires may request the Third Umpire for certain close calls such as line calls (to determine run outs and stumpings) and boundary calls, a challenge is used in situations that may result in a dismissal: for example, to determine if the ball is a legal catch (making contact with the batsman's bat or glove and not touching the ground before being held by a fielder) or if a delivery made the criteria for a leg before wicket dismissal (hitting the ground in line or on the off side and hitting the batsman in line with a path that would have hit the wicket). The Third Umpire then reports to the on-field umpire whether his analysis supports the original call, contradicts the call, or is inconclusive. The on-field umpire then makes the final decision: either re-signalling a call that is standing or revoking a call that is being reversed and then making the corrected signal.
Each team can go for referrals until they use their share of unsuccessful reviews. Under the DRS rule only clearly incorrect decisions are reversed; if the Third Umpire's analysis is within established margins of error or is otherwise inconclusive, the on-field umpire's original call stands.
When a not-out LBW decision is evaluated, and if the replay demonstrates the ball has made impact more than 2.5m away from the wickets, the umpires also have to consider another feature: the distance the ball has travelled between pitching and hitting the pad.
If that distance (between pitching and pad) is less than 40cm and if the ball has to travel more than 2.5m to reach the stumps, then any not-out decision given by the on-field umpire will remain not out.
It has also been decided that if the batsman is more than 3.5m from the wicket, then again not-out decisions will not be reversed.
The only picture in which an LBW decision will be reversed in favor of the bowler is if the batsman is more than 2.5m away from the wicket, if the distance is less than 3.5m and the distance between pitching and point of impact is more than 40cm. In that case, some part of the ball must be hitting the middle stump, and the whole ball must be hitting the stumps below the bails. In cases where the original decision is out, the 2.5m or 40cm distances do not apply, as in that state Hawk Eye must show the ball to be completely missing the stumps in order for the umpire to undo his decision.
Technology
The UDRS primarily uses a ball tracking technology, the Hawk-eye, which shows the ball’s trajectory towards the stumps in a visual representation, thereby aiding in giving Leg Before decisions. However, the path that a ball takes depends on lots of related scientific and other external factors, like the bounce on the pitch, seam movement, weather conditions and the like. It is thus not possible for the Hawk-eye to gauge the ball’s movement in a certain manner, it can only predict that. But nevertheless it does manage to give a more than satisfactory representation. The other technology in the UDRS, the very famous, ‘Hot –Spot’, is comparatively much more foolproof with its infra-red transmission of a negative image to validate the umpire’s decision for any snick or bat-pad verdict. However, the viewers didn’t get to see it in this World Cup as the Melbourne based company that supplies ‘Hot Spot’ has backed out of its earlier promise of delivering it by the knockout stages of the tournament
UDRS in ICC World Cup 2011
The first referral of the World Cup came after the 4th ball of the 2nd innings was bowled. India's Shanthakumaran Sreesanth had bowled a yorker and the umpire declared it not out.
Dhoni referred it to the TV umpire and a replay showed it might have missed the leg stump, so the original decision was upheld. The match marked the debut of the controversial umpire referral system in World Cup cricket.
Dhoni says no to UDRS system
Indian captain MS Dhoni on Wednesday(3 November 2010) said he was not willing to support the Umpires Decision Review System (UDRS) if it doesn't come with a warranty.
Dhoni said, "Referral system as I personally believe is not a cent per cent thing. It doesn't give cent per cent return and it is not always correct."
"I am not going to buy a life jacket that doesn't come with a warranty. And we are concerned about the big money that we are supposed to spend if the UDRS system comes into the game," said Dhoni, asking the umpires to step up and raise their performance. "I don't support the UDRS system as you have two gentlemen standing as umpires on the filed, who are professionals. They also have the support of the third umpire."
Garner labels review system as a 'gimmick'
West Indies legend Joel Garner has labelled the controversial umpire decision review system currently being introduced into Test cricket "a gimmick" and claimed it is "not working".
"I can understand the use of TV technology in terms of run outs, stumpings and that sort of thing, like whether the ball has pitched between wicket and wicket or outside leg-stump, if the umpire has doubts,"
"You still want the umpires to use their own judgment. If you're going to use it, it should only be used specifically for one or two things but not to question every little thing that happens with the umpires."
Master blaster Sachin Tendulkar on Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS)
Master blaster Sachin Tendulkar on Thursday (16/06/2011) said that he was not against the use of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS). UDRS would be more effective with the support of snickometer and hotspot technology.
He said the use of these two, along with the UDRS, would give more consistent results.
Sachin said that Hawkeye, another technology used to assist umpires, was not always foolproof in judging the line and bounce of the ball.
UDRS is a joke in present form: Rashid Latif
Pakistan's former captain Rashid Latif says he shares Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni's concerns about the accuracy of the Umpires Decision Review System (UDRS) as the innovation is nothing but a "joke" in its present form.
He gave the example of the India and Ireland match in Bangalore.
"In the India-Ireland match, an Irish batsman (Cusack) was given LBW after a review. Earlier, the umpire correctly turned down the appeal because the batsman was well down the track - more than 2.5 metres. To me, it was a clear-cut decision but the hawk-eye suggested otherwise. If the wicket was of the Perth, then it would be a mind-boggling decision,"
"The manner in which the system has been applied in the World Cup and the way decisions of the umpires have been reversed or upheld because of it indicate it is nothing but a joke," Latif said.
Percentage of correct decisions in the ICC World Cup
ICC flaunts the fact that the percentage of correct decisions in the World Cup has risen to 97.82 from 90.18 due to the use of UDRS but its a long way to go.
The Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS or DRS) is a new technology based system currently being used on an experimental basis in the sport of cricket.
The system is being used only in Test Cricket for the sole purpose of reviewing the controversial decisions made by the on-field umpires in the case of a batsman being dismissed or not.
UDRS system was first used on 24 November 2009 in Test Matches
The UDRS system was officially launched by International Cricket Council on 24 November 2009 during the first Test between New Zealand and Pakistan at the University Oval in Dunedin.
UDRS system in ODIs
It was first used in ODIs in January 2011, in England’s series against Australia.
Recently, the ICC has made the UDRS mandatory in all international matches.
Cost of UDRS System
The UDRS costs approximately USD 56,000 per match day, that is, almost Rs 25 lakh. And thus, for a five day Test match, the cost may go upto Rs 1.25 crore.
How does UDRS work :
Each team is allowed to make two unsuccessful review requests per innings during a match. A fielding team may use the system to dispute a "not out" call and a batting team may do so to dispute an "out" call.
The fielding team captain or the batsman being dismissed invokes the challenge by signalling a "T" with the arms. Once the challenge is invoked, acknowledged, and agreed, the Third Umpire reviews the play. While umpires may request the Third Umpire for certain close calls such as line calls (to determine run outs and stumpings) and boundary calls, a challenge is used in situations that may result in a dismissal: for example, to determine if the ball is a legal catch (making contact with the batsman's bat or glove and not touching the ground before being held by a fielder) or if a delivery made the criteria for a leg before wicket dismissal (hitting the ground in line or on the off side and hitting the batsman in line with a path that would have hit the wicket). The Third Umpire then reports to the on-field umpire whether his analysis supports the original call, contradicts the call, or is inconclusive. The on-field umpire then makes the final decision: either re-signalling a call that is standing or revoking a call that is being reversed and then making the corrected signal.
Each team can go for referrals until they use their share of unsuccessful reviews. Under the DRS rule only clearly incorrect decisions are reversed; if the Third Umpire's analysis is within established margins of error or is otherwise inconclusive, the on-field umpire's original call stands.
When a not-out LBW decision is evaluated, and if the replay demonstrates the ball has made impact more than 2.5m away from the wickets, the umpires also have to consider another feature: the distance the ball has travelled between pitching and hitting the pad.
If that distance (between pitching and pad) is less than 40cm and if the ball has to travel more than 2.5m to reach the stumps, then any not-out decision given by the on-field umpire will remain not out.
It has also been decided that if the batsman is more than 3.5m from the wicket, then again not-out decisions will not be reversed.
The only picture in which an LBW decision will be reversed in favor of the bowler is if the batsman is more than 2.5m away from the wicket, if the distance is less than 3.5m and the distance between pitching and point of impact is more than 40cm. In that case, some part of the ball must be hitting the middle stump, and the whole ball must be hitting the stumps below the bails. In cases where the original decision is out, the 2.5m or 40cm distances do not apply, as in that state Hawk Eye must show the ball to be completely missing the stumps in order for the umpire to undo his decision.
Technology
The UDRS primarily uses a ball tracking technology, the Hawk-eye, which shows the ball’s trajectory towards the stumps in a visual representation, thereby aiding in giving Leg Before decisions. However, the path that a ball takes depends on lots of related scientific and other external factors, like the bounce on the pitch, seam movement, weather conditions and the like. It is thus not possible for the Hawk-eye to gauge the ball’s movement in a certain manner, it can only predict that. But nevertheless it does manage to give a more than satisfactory representation. The other technology in the UDRS, the very famous, ‘Hot –Spot’, is comparatively much more foolproof with its infra-red transmission of a negative image to validate the umpire’s decision for any snick or bat-pad verdict. However, the viewers didn’t get to see it in this World Cup as the Melbourne based company that supplies ‘Hot Spot’ has backed out of its earlier promise of delivering it by the knockout stages of the tournament
UDRS in ICC World Cup 2011
The first referral of the World Cup came after the 4th ball of the 2nd innings was bowled. India's Shanthakumaran Sreesanth had bowled a yorker and the umpire declared it not out.
Dhoni referred it to the TV umpire and a replay showed it might have missed the leg stump, so the original decision was upheld. The match marked the debut of the controversial umpire referral system in World Cup cricket.
Dhoni says no to UDRS system
Indian captain MS Dhoni on Wednesday(3 November 2010) said he was not willing to support the Umpires Decision Review System (UDRS) if it doesn't come with a warranty.
Dhoni said, "Referral system as I personally believe is not a cent per cent thing. It doesn't give cent per cent return and it is not always correct."
"I am not going to buy a life jacket that doesn't come with a warranty. And we are concerned about the big money that we are supposed to spend if the UDRS system comes into the game," said Dhoni, asking the umpires to step up and raise their performance. "I don't support the UDRS system as you have two gentlemen standing as umpires on the filed, who are professionals. They also have the support of the third umpire."
Garner labels review system as a 'gimmick'
West Indies legend Joel Garner has labelled the controversial umpire decision review system currently being introduced into Test cricket "a gimmick" and claimed it is "not working".
"I can understand the use of TV technology in terms of run outs, stumpings and that sort of thing, like whether the ball has pitched between wicket and wicket or outside leg-stump, if the umpire has doubts,"
"You still want the umpires to use their own judgment. If you're going to use it, it should only be used specifically for one or two things but not to question every little thing that happens with the umpires."
Master blaster Sachin Tendulkar on Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS)
Master blaster Sachin Tendulkar on Thursday (16/06/2011) said that he was not against the use of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS). UDRS would be more effective with the support of snickometer and hotspot technology.
He said the use of these two, along with the UDRS, would give more consistent results.
Sachin said that Hawkeye, another technology used to assist umpires, was not always foolproof in judging the line and bounce of the ball.
UDRS is a joke in present form: Rashid Latif
Pakistan's former captain Rashid Latif says he shares Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni's concerns about the accuracy of the Umpires Decision Review System (UDRS) as the innovation is nothing but a "joke" in its present form.
He gave the example of the India and Ireland match in Bangalore.
"In the India-Ireland match, an Irish batsman (Cusack) was given LBW after a review. Earlier, the umpire correctly turned down the appeal because the batsman was well down the track - more than 2.5 metres. To me, it was a clear-cut decision but the hawk-eye suggested otherwise. If the wicket was of the Perth, then it would be a mind-boggling decision,"
"The manner in which the system has been applied in the World Cup and the way decisions of the umpires have been reversed or upheld because of it indicate it is nothing but a joke," Latif said.
Percentage of correct decisions in the ICC World Cup
ICC flaunts the fact that the percentage of correct decisions in the World Cup has risen to 97.82 from 90.18 due to the use of UDRS but its a long way to go.
SSC COMBINED GRADUATE LEVEL (TIER-II) EXAM.2011 Duplicate Admit card
SSC COMBINED GRADUATE LEVEL (TIER-II) EXAM.2011
Duplicate Admit card
Click Here
http://ssc-cr.org/cgl_tier_2_2011.php
Saturday, 13 August 2011
SUPREME COURT BRINGS STUDENT’S ANSWER SHEET UNDER RTI
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the disclosure, under the Right to Information Act, of answer sheets of students of any examination conducted by any agency in India.
Supreme Court on 9th August 2011 has announced that any Student aggrieved by the marks awarded to him/her in the Exams can now make an application and have a look at how the marks have been awarded.
University Of Calcutta & Ors vs Pritam Rooj on 5 February, 2009
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/514738/
The case reached the Supreme court from high court which by its March 28, 2008, judgment permitted a student, Pritam Rooj, to inspect his answer sheets. Rooj was a student of mathematics in the Presidency College.
In 2006, when he sat for the first part of degree examination he secured 52 percent marks. In the second year he got 208 out of 400 marks and got just 28 marks out of 100 in fifth papers. Upon seeking re-evaluation, his marks increased by four in the fifth paper.
He contended that his poor marks stood in the way of his getting admission in post-graduation course and applied to inspect his mark sheet under the RTI law which was rejected. The university said that the answer sheets of an examinee cannot be shared.
Sunday, 17 July 2011
World's newest nation : South Sudan
" 99 per cent of southern Sudanese had voted for independence from the north of Sudan in the referendum.
On 9th july 2011, Oil-rich South Sudan became the world's newest country, splitting away from Khartoum-ruled north after decades of brutal war that claimed two million lives. "
Capital Juba
Largest city Juba
Official language English
Regional languages Juba Arabic, Dinka, Nuer, Zande, Bari, Shilluk
First President Salva Kiir Mayardit
First Vice-President Riek Machar
Area 619,745 km2 (45th rank)
Population 8,260,490 (94th rank)
Currency Sudanese pound
Time zone East Africa Time (UTC+3)
Calling code 249
On 9th july 2011, Oil-rich South Sudan became the world's newest country, splitting away from Khartoum-ruled north after decades of brutal war that claimed two million lives. "
Capital Juba
Largest city Juba
Official language English
Regional languages Juba Arabic, Dinka, Nuer, Zande, Bari, Shilluk
First President Salva Kiir Mayardit
First Vice-President Riek Machar
Area 619,745 km2 (45th rank)
Population 8,260,490 (94th rank)
Currency Sudanese pound
Time zone East Africa Time (UTC+3)
Calling code 249
Sunday, 3 April 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)